Review



computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10  (Draftware Developers)

 
  • Logo
  • About
  • News
  • Press Release
  • Team
  • Advisors
  • Partners
  • Contact
  • Bioz Stars
  • Bioz vStars
    • 90
      Buy from Supplier

    Structured Review

    Draftware Developers computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
    Polyethylene wear analysis with the <t>PolyWare</t> software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Computerized Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10/product/Draftware Developers
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars

    Images

    1) Product Images from "The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty"

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Techniques Used: Software

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Techniques Used:

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.
    Figure Legend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Techniques Used:

    Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient
    Figure Legend Snippet: Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Techniques Used: Comparison, Software



    Similar Products

    computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10  (Draftware Developers)
    90
    Draftware Developers computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10
    Polyethylene wear analysis with the <t>PolyWare</t> software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.
    Computerized Method Polyware Pro 3d Digital Vs. 5.10, supplied by Draftware Developers, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
    https://www.bioz.com/result/computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10/product/Draftware Developers
    Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
    computerized method polyware pro 3d digital vs. 5.10 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-04
    90/100 stars
    		  Buy from Supplier

    Image Search Results


    Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Polyethylene wear analysis with the PolyWare software. A. Circles are fitted to the peripheries of the cup and femoral head shadows B. At the end of the analysis a solid cup model is added to the output. Right hips are flipped about the vertical axis to look like left hips prior to analysis.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques: Software

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots, with lines of equality for repeatability measures for each of the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of two measurements; y-axis: the difference between 2 measurements (y = measurement 1 – measurement 2); red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); x-axis: first measurement; y-axis: second measurement; maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques:

    Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Bland-Altman plots and scatter plots with lines of equality for concurrent validity between the 3 methods. Bland-Altman plots (columns 1 and 3); x-axis: average of the measurements of 2 methods; y-axis: difference between measurements of 2 methods; red lines: 95% limits of agreement; dashed line: bias from 0; solid green line: y = 0 line; dots: individual double measures. Scatter plots (columns 2 and 4); maroon lines: lines of equality; EGS-RSA: radiostereometric analysis using sphere models; PW1: PolyWare using only the final follow-up radiographs; PW2: PolyWare using the postoperative and final follow-up radiographs.

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques:

    Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Journal: Acta Orthopaedica

    Article Title: The final follow-up plain radiograph is sufficient for clinical evaluation of polyethylene wear in total hip arthroplasty

    doi: 10.3109/17453674.2010.506632

    Figure Lengend Snippet: Marginal cost analysis in € (euros) for polyethylene wear analysis by EGS-RSA and with PolyWare as used in this study. For easy comparison, the staff costs are listed per patient

    Article Snippet: Analysis was performed by an experienced observer (LLA) with a computerized method (PolyWare Pro 3D Digital vs. 5.10; Draftware Developers, Conway, SC).

    Techniques: Comparison, Software